Would the financial exposure from Pung extend to sub-county local units through chargebacks? Going back to the key difference that it includes money the county never collected
Good question, and this was on my mind as well. I don’t think the chargeback as constructed now could be wrenched into being interpreted as applicable in that situation. The chargeback is really described as applicable to delinquent taxes not recovered.
Would the financial exposure from Pung extend to sub-county local units through chargebacks? Going back to the key difference that it includes money the county never collected
Good question, and this was on my mind as well. I don’t think the chargeback as constructed now could be wrenched into being interpreted as applicable in that situation. The chargeback is really described as applicable to delinquent taxes not recovered.